Photo: Unsplash by Sophia Sforza |
To start, I want to say that although I personally don’t
understand gun ownership and would never want or have a firearm in my home, I
respect the Second Amendment to the Constitution and recognize that just
because I am anti-gun, I totally get that my personal belief is not the same as
everyone else’s.
That being said, the latest school shootings bring me to a
place of concern and fear about the direction of our country when it comes to
gun violence. It is time for reasonable action. The NRA talking points say
that “gun control doesn’t work” and yet
Canada, Japan, England Australia, Spain, Sweden, Germany, Iceland, Italy, and
Denmark all have passed stricter gun laws and saw decreases in gun violence and
deaths. So why wouldn’t it work here?
The latest solution by Mr. Trump is to arm school teachers
(or the top 20% qualified school teachers to be exact). I can’t, for even a
millisecond, believe that is even being considered. A clip from an old All in The Family episode shows Archie Bunker talking on how to reduce gun violence on airplanes by
arming passengers. He speaks about gun control being nothing but a conspiracy to turn the US
into Russia. This was considered satire, so ridiculous that it was funny.
Yet, it isn’t far off from what is being proposed by leadership today. It is
hard to fathom how we got here. Here’s
the clip if you are interested: https://youtu.be/_ai_BkSN8jg
The solution to gun violence is certainly not to add more
guns. What other problem has anyone been able to solve by increasing the cause
of the problem? How does that make sense?
Let’s talk about our teachers. They have one of the toughest
jobs there is. Many teachers are under-paid, under-appreciated and have a huge
and important responsibility to educate our children. Now our government wants
to give them guns to protect the school on top of it. There are so many problems with
that, I don’t even know where to begin. The security guard who’s entire job and
purpose for being at the school in Florida last week could not do anything
about the shooting and now we expect the teachers to step up? I can’t imagine a
worse idea than that. The sound bite I heard from the NRA spokesperson as well
as from Mr. Trump was “harden our school”. Really? How does that make
any sense?
Police officers and security guards go into their jobs
understanding that using firearms and protecting citizens is at the core of
what they are trained, hired and expected to do. I am not implying that our
teachers aren’t brave or aren’t adept at using a firearm. I bet many are both,
but that doesn’t mean they could or should be carrying a gun in school. The
trained security guard couldn’t step up and we are asking Mrs. Smith to do it
while she is trying to do the hundreds of other tasks we put on our teachers
every day? And what type of gun would it be? If someone was in the school with
the type of gun used in every mass shooting, how could an armed
teacher really help? He or she is expected to make a kill shot while being
sprayed by bullets? Are we saying that our teacher are able to do it on the first try, because it’s unlikely that they would be alive to get a second
shot.
This is not a video game or movie,
it is real life.
So let’s then turn to the mental health argument. Of course,
any human being who decides to shoot or kill another human being is not of
sound mind. That’s a no brainer. The problem is that the vast majority of
people with mental illness are not dangerous or problematic. People with mental
health issues are much more likely to be victims of violence than to be
perpetrators, yet there is a huge misconception perpetuated by fear and lack of
knowledge about mental health. Other countries have just as many challenges
with mental illness as the US, yet they don’t have the same problem with gun
violence at the level that we do. What’s the differentiator?
One of the best quotes I read comes from this article in the
Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/02/what-i-saw-treating-the-victims-from-parkland-should-change-the-debate-on-guns/553937/
“A medical professor taught me about the dangers of drawing incorrect conclusions from data with the example of gum chewing, smokers, and lung cancer. He said smokers may be more likely to chew gum to cover bad breath, but that one cannot look at the data and decide that gum chewing causes lung cancer. It is the same type of erroneous logic that focuses on mental health after mass shootings, when banning the sale of semi-automatic rifles would be a far more effective means of preventing them.”
Not
only is the mental health argument FALSE, it perpetuates the stigma that
surrounds mental health in this country. If you have symptoms of diabetes, you would go to a
doctor. If you break a bone in your leg, you would go to the ER. If you have
racing thoughts, feel sad or depressed, have trouble getting out of bed, are struggling with overwhelming
fears or negative thoughts… what do you do? Many people unfortunately would do
nothing until the situation gets out of control. Common symptoms of depression
are mistakenly thought of as character flaws instead of what they really are; symptoms of a diagnosable medical issue. Having depression or anxiety is no
different from having diabetes, high cholesterol or the flu. But the stigma
associated with mental health problems creates misconceptions that stop people
from getting appropriate treatment. The current debate and comments by Mr.
Trump are only making it worse!
American
Academy of Pediatrics has come out with new guidelines for all pediatricians to
screen for depression and anxiety. This is so important. Taking your child to a
doctor to screen for depression shouldn’t be any different from taking your
child to the doctor for a flu or strep test. Currently that is not what is
happening and so many of our kids are falling through the cracks and not
getting appropriate support and treatment because of the stigma attached to
mental health issues. By putting the blame of mass shootings on mental health,
we are perpetuating the stigma and increasing the problem of inadequate
treatment. I recognize that overall healthcare in this country has room for
improvement, specifically behavioral health. Part of the solution is to talk
openly about depression and mental health as a treatable disease and not a
stigma or flaw.
So,
just because I am not in favor of gun ownership, doesn’t mean I don’t respect
other people’s rights to use and own guns.
I understand that a factor that makes this country so great is it's diversity in
opinion and thought.
That
being said, we still need laws and guidance. We regulate so many things in this
country. We register our cars, we have age limits on purchasing
alcohol and cigarettes, we have laws prohibiting drug. So why are guns not looked at the same way? Let’s start looking at the types of guns on the market and seeking more sensible solutions than arming our school teachers. Implement regulations like banning semi-automatic weapons, stricter background checks, enforcing a waiting period, consistent licensing and
registration for all guns and owners across all states as a starting point. Even Fox News contributor, retired Lt. Colonel Ralph Peters has come out stating the ridiculousness of AR-15 being in the public sector. The only purpose for that gun is to kill humans and has no place outside of the military. See his interview here: https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemocrats/videos/1955053397921038/
After all, if legislators find it appropriate to introduce laws to change the packaging of laundry detergent because of the tide pod challenge I would think it would be appropriate to put some more regulation around gun ownership. Don’t you?
After all, if legislators find it appropriate to introduce laws to change the packaging of laundry detergent because of the tide pod challenge I would think it would be appropriate to put some more regulation around gun ownership. Don’t you?